If you haven’t heard, just a short while ago Pfizer announced it would be making a vaccine for a new strain of the Zika virus, likely causing a wave of cases in the U.S. and other parts of the world. This is great news. While this is an important decision, the vaccine does raise some ethical questions.
The first one is whether we should be encouraging people to take this vaccine just because it might save them from the virus. That’s a lot of risk to take as someone might be unable to fly to the U.S. and there’s a good chance we’ll kill them. The second is whether there are any legitimate uses for the vaccine, and the third is whether we should push for it to be made public. The answer to all three is a resounding yes.
The vaccine was approved in the U.S. in June. The FDA issued a public statement last month clarifying that the vaccine has no known side effect and that the vaccine will most likely be used to fight the disease in the coming months. The FDA also states that the vaccine will only be available in the U.S. for a few months, but the decision to push for the vaccine to be made public is very much up in the air.
The fact is that we don’t know the ultimate goal of the vaccine. We only know that the vaccine will be ready to deploy at the end of next year. With no other options available to companies, companies will have to choose between having a vaccine in the U.S. that could potentially cause side effects, or not having a vaccine if it causes side effects. If there are no side effects, companies will keep the vaccine in the U.S.
The fact is that many companies have already taken a risk by having a vaccine in the U.S. that will cost more money. The fact is that companies are getting their money’s worth out of this, but that doesn’t mean the company is completely right.
The fact is that companies are getting their moneys worth out of this, but that doesnt mean the company is completely right. The answer is to have a better vaccine. The correct answer is to have a vaccine that is safe and affordable. And the most important part of this is, that vaccine will have to be made in the U.S. The second most important part is, that vaccine must be made by a company that has a proven track record for producing safe vaccines.
The vaccine, made by Merck & Co., is actually not the only company with a proven track record of doing vaccines. You can check out the links that we have posted to Dr. Thomas Jefferson’s website, which actually includes a list of vaccine companies that are currently making vaccines.
The vaccine is being tested for its safety by the U.S. government and by the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It should be around the corner and ready for testing in the next 3 to 5 months but only if there are no delays in the manufacturing process.
As it turns out, the vaccine has been around for quite some time but it was only recently that it was being made available to people. After it was approved and available to the public, it was only a matter of time before companies began to be hesitant to make the vaccine because of the possibility of lawsuits.
The vaccine works by injecting a small amount of a vaccine ingredient into the bloodstream of people who are at high risk of developing a serious illness. In theory, it should be safer than the flu vaccine because it doesn’t travel through the bloodstream after you receive it. The problem is that in many cases, the flu vaccine has caused people to develop the flu after the flu vaccine just doesn’t work.