This quote from the Hindu scripture, The Bhagavad-gita (2.3), has been used for centuries in India to explain the importance of maintaining a positive mental state. The mantra “Om Mani Padme Hum” (ओमन मनाम मनाम) translates to “I am God (me”), God (mine), and God (I).
In India, the Sanskrit word “Mani” means a person’s overall mental state, and the phrase “Om Mani Padme Hum” is a way of conveying that you should be positive and happy in your own life, even if you are the person who is suffering the negative effects. The way the word is used in the Bhagavad-gita is a classic example of how we use language as a tool for understanding each other.
In this video, we see a young guy who lives in a village being pulled by two people in a car. The person in the car keeps telling the guy to “keep the beat” because they know the guy in the village is on drugs. The person in the car stops the car, and the young guy goes to the guy in the car to ask what he is doing there.
The guy in the video seems to have a lot of different levels of self-awareness. He knows he is on drugs, he knows he’s in a car, and he knows the guy in the car is pulling him to the side because the guy has been telling him not to get involved. There is a whole hierarchy of self-awareness at play here. The person in the video seems like a very aware person, but he is also very aware of the person in the car.
The car seems to be aware of the person in the video. The two of them don’t appear to have a lot of direct contact, but the car is aware of the person in the video and seems to be communicating with it. They don’t seem to have any direct contact, but the car seems to be aware of the person in the video and seems to be communicating with it.
The car is aware of the person in the video, but it’s the person in the video who seems to be communicating with it. To the extent that he can, the car appears to be able to read his thoughts (or the thoughts of whoever is in the passenger seat) and to know what he’s thinking, and what it’s like to be in his car, but to not know why the person in the car is thinking about him.
The car gets the message, but the person in the car seems to be the person in the video. This is the first time we’ve seen the car in action. The person in the video is not the person in the video who we were talking to about the car. This is not the end of it.
So far we’ve seen the car in action in this video and in the video of this video. The person in the video is not the person in the video we are talking to about the car. We’re not sure what’s going on. The person in the video seems to get the message and the car moves forward.
We had a few fun moments of shooting the car at a busy intersection. We even managed to hit one of the cameras. But when we saw the car in its new action mode, we were pretty sure that this was the person in the video. It’s not clear if the car was being driven by Vahn at the time of his death or if Vahn was the one who was killed in his car.
The car in the video is actually an open-top four-wheeler, which is essentially a minivans. It’s very different from the car we are talking about in the video. But the driver’s seat in the video is a bit weird because it looks like the driver is sitting forward and the passenger’s seat is sitting back.